Q “How to Survive a Plague” (available online through UCI library portal) and the Shabazz chapter, “Ghost Mapping” (available through Canvas files). Through an intersectional lens compare and contrast the outcomes, power structures and stakeholders in the two cases. What accounted for the differences in the two cases? • What role did experts or expertise play in the development of knowledge about AIDS and solutions to the epidemic? o Who has the right to speak for science or the environment? 600 words (minimum) and include 2 photos that are representative of your analysis. APA citations. Extra Credit worth 3 points You can view the documentary film using this link: https://uci.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14624439600004701&institutionId=4701&customerId=4700 Please make sure that your VPN is set to FULL before you click on the link above. More information on using the VPN available hereLinks to an external site. Rubric Analysis of Urban Responses to the AIDS Epidemic Analysis of Urban Responses to the AIDS Epidemic Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing 5 pts Full Marks 3.33 pts Accomplished Piece was written in an interesting style and voice Somewhat informative and organized 1.67 pts Capable Piece had little style or voice Gives some new information but poorly organized 0 pts Beginner Piece had no style or voice Gives no new information and very poorly organized 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo photos including captions that indicate source of photo 3 pts Full Marks 1.5 pts Half marks 0 pts No Marks 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding 3 pts Full Marks Writing shows strong understanding 1.5 pts Half Marks Writing shows adequate understanding 0 pts No Marks Writing is unclear and inappropriate for the purposes of this assignment 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord count minimum 600 2 pts Full Marks 1 pts Half marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics Basic proofreading (Grammar/spelling), APA citations and reference page 2 pts Full Marks 1 pts Needs improvement 0 pts No Marks 2 pts Total Points: 15